KHUTAB III - 25. THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATION
25. THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATION
The English poet and fiction-writer,
Rudyad Kipling (1865-1936) was born in Bombay
(now Mumbay), India
on 30 Dec. 1865. Among his writing were two Jungle Books. Being raised as an English man in the Indian
subcontinent he noticed the gap between the Eastern civilization in general and
the Indian one in particular and the Western civilization. He put it in his poem, as follows:
Oh, East is East and West is West
And never the twain shall meet.
Till Earth and Sky stand presently at
God’s great Judgment Seat;
People
used to cite these lines to indicate the enormous difference between the two
civilizations and cultures, that they cannot meet and accommodate each other.
For example, in Indonesia
it is a taboo to touch an adult’s head, and for the Arabs to touch someone's
buttock as this is interpretated as a homosexual advance.
People
used to stop here with these two lines. However, if we continue reading the
next lines of the poem, it indicates that there is exception. The continuation
of the lines is:
But there is neither East nor West,
Border, nor Breed,
nor Birth,
When two strong men stand face to face,
tho’ they come
from the ends of the earth!
What the poet means here is that if two men strong
enough to understand and tolerate each other, the barrier between the two
cultures will vanish. However, there are sacred things in every religion which
have to be observed by its followers, that it is a taboo to violate them, such
as the sanctity of the Ka‘bah, the Qur’ān and the Prophet in Islam, to mention
a few.
In 1993
Dr. Samuel P. Huntington published his book The Clash of Civilization and
the Remarking of the World Order. He said that at the end of the cold war
between the United States
and the Soviet Union, and after the fall of the Soviet
Union, the world is entering a phase of clashes between
civilizations. He mentions eight of them, namely, Western, Confucian, Japanese,
Islamic, Hindu, Slavic-Orthodox, Latin American, and probably African. These
civilizations are differentiated from each other by history, language, culture,
tradition and especially religion. He states that Western civilization is the
most powerful, and it can be said that the clash is between Western
civilization and the rest. He also says that Islamic and Confucian
civilizations are the most dangerous to the West (p. 10).
Islam
is being followed by approximately one-fifth of the world population. The Confucian
civilization is also being followed by approximately one-fifth of the world population,
especially among Chinese people, each with more than one billion people.
However, Islamic civilization is being singled out as “a potential threat” to
the West. It is an irony that the West had colonised and occupied the Muslim
world (for example: Algeria
and Western Sahara by France,
Libya by Italy, Indian sub-continent and Malaysia by the British, and Indonesia by the Dutch) and had
interfered with their internal affairs. After losing their grip of these areas,
Western powers suddenly claimed that their inhabitants were posing a threat to
their system of life. They fear that Islam will penetrate their way of life and
freedom.
Who is
interfering whose business? When the late President Sukarno of Indonesia was asked by a Western journalist in
an interview what he would like to say to America
(i.e., U.S.A.),
he simply said, “Leave us alone, leave us alone!” When a Muslim country is
using a nuclear reactor for peaceful purposes, such as to generate electricity,
they suspect that this country will produce “an Islamic nuclear bomb”, posing a
threat to the West, whereas Israel, India and South Africa that already possesses
nuclear bombs are acceptable to them.
The
collapse of Socialism in the Soviet Union is
simply because the system cannot give both spiritual and material prosperity to
its people. Capitalism was victorious over Socialism without firing a single
shot. It succeeds, to some extent, in giving material prosperity to its people
at the expense of spiritual happiness, resulting in moral degradation.
Homosexuality, drunkenness, gambling, rape, living together out of matrimony,
sex industry, the use of illegal drugs and other social evils and diseases are
rampant among people in their big cities. This is the Jāhiliyyah (the
era of ignorance) of the 21th century era. Islam, and only Islam, that can cure
these ills as it had done with the Jāhiliyyah of the 6th
century.
The
people of the Jāhiliyyah of the 6th century fought the
Prophet and his followers, because they could not produce a system better than
that of the Qur’an in order to challenge it. What would happen if the clash
between Western and Islamic civilization does really take place, and which of
the two will be victorious? What we know is the West is confusing the world by
creating fear with different labels to describe various phenomena in the Muslim
world which are foreign to the Muslims themselves, such as “Islamic
fundamentalism,” “Islamic Resurgence,” “Militant Islam,” and “Political
Islam.” Earlier in the last century until now the Orientalists are
still using the misleading terms “Classical Islam,” “Medieval Islam,” and
“Modern Islam” as if this religion is divided into three categories,
when they meant “Islam in Classical Period,” “Islam in Medieval Period,” and
“Islam in Modern Period” respectively. A bolder statement was given by Prof.
Dr. Charles J. Adams, the Head of the Institute of Islamic Studies of McGill
University in Montreal in late 1973 in one of his lectures when he said about
“Islam according to God,” “Islam according to the angel Gabriel,” “Islam
according to Muhammad,” and “Islam according to the Sahabah” as if the
message of Islam had not been presented in its original and true sense.
The clash between Islamic
and Western civilizations is apparently inevitable, directly or indirectly,
peacefully through integration or forcefully through confrontation. The winner
will be the better one, although embraced by weak followers. A system or an
idea cannot be defeated by defeating its followers, but by challenging it with
a better system or idea. This reminds us of the expression “The ink of the
writer is worthier (stronger) than the blood of the martyr.” The martyr
kills the enemy, but it is the writer who can kill the idea which the enemy is
fighting for. Fukuyama
in his work The End of History and the Last Man (1993) has predicted the
victory of Islam over other systems. For the Muslims, they have been promised
by Allah with the final victory. Allah says in the Qur’ān,
هُوَ الَّذِي أَرْسَلَ رَسُولَهُ بِالْهُدَى
وَدِينِ الْحَقِّ لِيُظْهِرَهُ عَلَى
الدِّينِ كُلِّهِ وَلَوْ كَرِهَ الْمُشْرِكُونَ
( الصف : ٩)
He it is Who has sent his Messenger [Muhammad]
with guidance and the religion of truth [Islamic Monotheism] to make victorious
over all (other) religions even though the polytheists hate it (Q. 61:9).
وَلَا تَهِنُوا وَلَا تَحْزَنُوا وَأَنْتُمُ
الْأَعْلَوْنَ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ مُؤْمِنِينَ (آل عمران :١٣٩)
So, do not become weak (against your enemy), nor be
sad, and you will
be superior (in victory) if you are indeed (true)
believers. (Q. 3:139)
كَتَبَ اللَّهُ لَأَغْلِبَنَّ أَنَا وَرُسُلِي إِنَّ اللَّهَ
قَوِيٌّ عَزِيزٌ (المجادلة : ٢١)
Allah has
decreed: ‘Verily, it is I and My Messengers who shall be victorious.’ Verily,
Allah is All-Powerful, All-Mighty. (Q. 58:21)
These
are some verses indicating the final victory of Islam over other religions and
systems of life. However, this victory of Islam is conditional, namely, with
Allah’s help. He says:
إِنْ يَنْصُرْكُمُ اللَّهُ فَلَا غَالِبَ لَكُمْ وَإِنْ يَخْذُلْكُمْ
فَمَنْ ذَا الَّذِي يَنْصُرُكُمْ مِنْ بَعْدِهِ
وَعَلَى اللَّهِ
فَلْيَتَوَكَّلِ الْمُؤْمِنُونَ (آل عمران : ١٦٠)
If Allah helps you, none
can overcome you; and if He forsakes
you, who is
there after Him that can help you. And in Allah
(Alone) let believers put their trust. (Q.
3:160)
Conclusion:
Islam will be victorious
in the conflict of civilization with the condition that it followers stick to
its principles and teachings. (ANUMA, 24 Febr., 07)
Comments
Post a Comment